Personal Investments • Re: 100% in stocks. 15 years to retirement. Too risky?

We don't get bothered by market volatility along the way. We care about the final, spendable, amount.

What do you all think? Too risky?

Edit:
*********
Many of you asked for details.

Here is current situation

Portfolio about 2.45m (all in VOO or equivalent, 65k in vanguard settlement fund)
Annual savings about 225k
Annual spend about 225k
Annual income: 550 to 600k depending on bonus

Stable jobs. Unlikely to lose jobs unless we are sick. Income evenly split.

Edit:
*******
Early 30s and early 40s couple with a year old child.

The biggest risk to 100% stock in your situation is the potential divorce if your spouse doesn't share your risk tolerance and your portfolio gets cut in half.

Is this a casual statement, in that being 100% in stocks could lead to divorce if spouse doesn't share the risk tolerance?

Or

Is this saying that being 100% stocks is very bad in case of divorce?

Statistics: Posted by watchnerd — Thu May 30, 2024 11:22 pm